Wellbeing Research

Prayer and Health Research: What the Evidence Shows (2026)

The evidence on prayer and physical health is mixed and limited. Intercessory prayer trials are mostly null, personal prayer shows modest correlations, and no study shows prayer cures illness. Here is what the peer-reviewed research actually found.

Pray FocusMarijan DivkovicAugust 30, 202610 min read

In short

The peer-reviewed evidence on prayer and physical health is mixed and limited. A 2009 Cochrane review of 10 randomized trials (7,646 patients) found no clear effect of intercessory prayer on death (relative risk 1.00), and the largest such trial, the STEP study (2006), found intercessory prayer did not reduce complications after cardiac bypass surgery. Studies of personal prayer and religious coping are more positive but describe association, not cause, and effects are strongest for people who are already religious. No credible study shows prayer cures illness. This page is not medical advice, and prayer is not a substitute for professional care.

  • A Cochrane review of 10 trials (7,646 patients) found no clear effect of intercessory prayer on death (RR 1.00).
  • The STEP trial found 30-day complications of 52% with prayer versus 51% without, a nonsignificant difference.
  • Personal prayer and religious coping trend more positive, but the findings are associations, not proof of cause.
  • Caveat: any measured benefit tracks public religious activity and already-religious people; prayer does not cure illness.

The peer-reviewed evidence on prayer and physical health is mixed and limited. A 2009 Cochrane review of 10 randomized trials with 7,646 patients found no clear effect of intercessory prayer on death (relative risk 1.00), and the largest such trial, the STEP study in the American Heart Journal (2006), found intercessory prayer did not reduce complications after cardiac bypass surgery. Studies of personal prayer and religious coping are more positive but describe association, not cause, and effects are strongest for people who are already religious. A 2009 meta-analysis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics linked religiosity to 18% lower mortality, yet that benefit tracked public religious activity, not private prayer. No credible study shows prayer cures illness.

RR 1.00

intercessory prayer had no clear effect on death (Cochrane review)

52% vs 51%

30-day complications with vs without prayer in the STEP trial

18% lower

mortality tied to religiosity, but to public activity, not prayer

78.8%

of US adults have ever prayed for their own healing

Key findings at a glance

MetricValueYearSource
Intercessory prayer effect on death (Cochrane)RR 1.002009Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
STEP trial: 30-day complications, prayer vs none52% vs 51%2006American Heart Journal
Religiosity and all-cause mortality18% lower2009Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Religion/spirituality therapy vs standard careg = 0.522023Psychotherapy Research
US adults who ever prayed for their own healing78.8%2010Journal of Religion and Health
US adults who pray at least daily44%2023-24Pew Research Center
Every figure below is traced to the primary source page that reports it, with the data year shown. Associations are not causes, and prayer is not a substitute for professional medical care.

The bottom line: mixed and limited evidence

The highest-quality reviews conclude honestly that the evidence is equivocal. Cochrane, the gold standard for systematic reviews, pooled the randomized trials of intercessory prayer and found no clear benefit on death or general clinical state, and declined to recommend for or against the practice.

RR 1.00
2009

A Cochrane systematic review of intercessory prayer found no clear effect on death, with a relative risk of 1.00 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.36) across 5 studies and 3,389 participants in 2009, according to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

10 trials, 7,646 patients
2009

The Cochrane review on intercessory prayer for ill health pooled 10 randomized controlled trials covering 7,646 patients in 2009, according to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

StatisticValueYearSource
No significant difference in general clinical state (RR 0.98, CI 0.86 to 1.11)RR 0.982009Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Review recommendation for or against intercessory prayerNo recommendation2009Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
The review authors call the overall evidence equivocal, citing unclear randomization and heterogeneous outcomes in the underlying trials.

Intercessory prayer trials: mostly null

Intercessory prayer means praying for distant patients, often strangers, under randomized conditions. The landmark STEP trial randomized more than 1,800 cardiac bypass patients and found no benefit; if anything, being told with certainty that one was prayed for tracked slightly worse outcomes, which the authors read as performance anxiety rather than harm from prayer.

52% vs 51%
2006

In the STEP randomized trial, 30-day complication rates were 52% for cardiac bypass patients who received intercessory prayer versus 51% for those who did not, a nonsignificant difference in 2006, according to the American Heart Journal.

1,802 patients
2006

The Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) randomized 1,802 coronary artery bypass patients across 6 US hospitals into three groups in 2006, according to the American Heart Journal.

StatisticValueYearSource
STEP: complications when told with certainty prayer was received59%2006American Heart Journal
Earlier systematic review of intercessory prayer literatureEquivocal2007Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
The higher 59% rate among patients certain they were prayed for is interpreted cautiously as possible performance anxiety, not a harmful effect of prayer itself. The 2007 review is an earlier version of the same Cochrane review family.

Build a daily prayer habit

Pray Focus helps you pray every day by gently locking distracting apps during your prayer time.

Personal prayer and coping: more positive, but association not cause

Studies of a person's own prayer and religious coping trend more positive than the intercessory trials, but they are observational or intervention studies whose benefits are largest for people who are already religious. They show association, not proof that prayer causes better health, and the direction of effect depends on the type of prayer.

g = 0.52
2023

A multi-level meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials found religious and spirituality-based therapy moderately more effective than standard treatment for mental health at post-treatment (Hedges g = 0.52) in 2023, according to Psychotherapy Research (Bouwhuis-van Keulen et al.).

HR 1.48
2023

In a nationwide US sample of 1,931 people with chronic illness, those who prayed daily or more were more likely to survive over 6 years (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.03) after adjusting for depression, social support, and health behaviors in 2023, according to the Journal of Religion and Health.

StatisticValueYearSource
Christian prayer and mental health review (meditative and conversational prayer)Mixed2025Frontiers in Psychology
Religion/spirituality therapy advantage at follow-up (symptoms)g = 0.722023Psychotherapy Research
HIV cohort: praying for known others and 17-year survival~2x survival2022Journal of Religion and Health
Cancer: spiritual wellbeing and quality of life (correlations)r = 0.36 to 0.702015Journal of Palliative Medicine
These are associations, not proof of cause. Therapy effects apply to structured religious or spiritual therapy, not prayer alone, and are largest for patients with a strong pre-existing religious or spiritual affiliation. The HIV effect was specific to praying for known others, with no effect for praying for oneself or strangers.

Public activity vs private prayer: the distinction that matters

Where survival benefits appear in the literature, they track community religious involvement more than private prayer, which points to social and behavioral pathways rather than prayer itself. Reverse causation is a real risk: sicker people often intensify prayer, which can make private prayer look harmful when it is not.

18% lower
2009

A meta-analysis of 69 studies found religiosity and spirituality associated with roughly 18% lower all-cause mortality in initially healthy populations (combined hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.87) in 2009, according to Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

HR 1.16
2013

In 43,708 postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative, daily private spiritual activity was associated with higher cardiovascular risk (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.30), a pattern the authors attributed to sicker women turning to prayer rather than prayer causing harm, in 2013, according to Annals of Epidemiology.

StatisticValueYearSource
Private prayer vs public activity for mortalityWeak/null for prayer2009Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Protective mortality effect: healthy vs already-diseased studies39.1% vs 22.7%2009Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
In the 2009 meta-analysis, organizational activity like service attendance predicted greater survival while private prayer showed weak or null associations, suggesting support and healthier habits more than prayer itself. A protective effect appeared in 39.1% of healthy-population studies but only 22.7% of already-diseased ones.

How different kinds of prayer relate to wellbeing

When researchers separate prayer by type, meditative and conversational prayer track better mental-health outcomes than ritual or petitionary prayer. These are cross-sectional associations, and brain-imaging work shows correlates of focused prayer, not health outcomes.

Meditative = wellbeing
1991

Research on prayer types found meditative prayer associated with greater existential wellbeing and colloquial (conversational) prayer with greater happiness, while ritual prayer was linked to more negative affect (Poloma and Pendleton framework), according to peer-reviewed prayer-type studies indexed on PubMed Central.

StatisticValueYearSource
Petitionary prayer and wellbeing measuresNo consistent link2014Journal of Religion and Health
Focused prayer and brain imaging (frontal-lobe activity)Frontal-lobe activity2003Perceptual and Motor Skills
Religious-based interventions for depression (meta-analysis)8 studies2022Journal of Affective Disorders
Petitionary prayer (asking God for specific things) showed no consistent link to wellbeing, unlike meditative and colloquial prayer. The brain-imaging work used very small preliminary samples and shows correlates of prayer, not health outcomes. The depression meta-analysis authors flag major methodological limitations that reduce reliability.

How many people pray for their health

Prayer for healing is one of the most common health behaviors in America, and researchers stress that people typically pray alongside medical care, not instead of it. Daily prayer overall has been declining, and it is much lower among the youngest adults.

78.8%
2010

78.8% of US adults reported ever praying for their own healing, according to the 2010 Baylor Religion Survey (published 2016) in the Journal of Religion and Health.

44%
2023-24

44% of US adults say they pray at least once a day in 2023-24, according to Pew Research Center.

StatisticValueYearSource
US adults who ever prayed for someone else's healing87.4%2010Journal of Religion and Health
US adults who ever asked others to pray for their health54.1%2010Journal of Religion and Health
Healing prayer used alongside, not instead of, medical careAlongside care2010Journal of Religion and Health
US adults who ever took part in laying on of hands for healing26.1%2010Journal of Religion and Health
US adults who ever joined a prayer group, circle, or chain53.0%2010Journal of Religion and Health
Highly religious adults who rely a lot on prayer for major decisions86%2016Pew Research Center
US adults who say grace or pray before meals often or always33%2023-24Pew Research Center
Daily prayer among US adults, 2007 to 2023-2458% to 44%2023-24Pew Research Center
US adults ages 18 to 24 who pray daily27%2023-24Pew Research Center
Most people who pray for healing do so as a complement to medicine, not an alternative. The reliance-on-prayer figure among highly religious adults comes from Pew's 2016 Religion in Everyday Life report. Daily prayer fell from 58% in 2007 to 44% in 2023-24 and is markedly lower among the youngest adults.

How we compiled these statistics

Every figure on this page is traced to a primary source and dated to the year the data was collected. Intercessory-prayer trial results come from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the STEP trial in the American Heart Journal. Mortality and religiosity figures come from a 2009 meta-analysis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, the Women's Health Initiative in Annals of Epidemiology, and cohort studies in the Journal of Religion and Health. Prevalence figures come from the 2010 Baylor Religion Survey (published in the Journal of Religion and Health) and Pew Research Center's 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study, with the reliance-on-prayer figure sourced to Pew's 2016 Religion in Everyday Life report. We frame every health finding as association rather than cause, keep the mostly null intercessory-prayer trials separate from the more positive personal-prayer and coping studies, and note reverse causation where sicker people pray more. We exclude any "prayer heals or cures" language. This page is a research summary, not medical advice, and prayer is not a substitute for professional care.

This page is a research summary, not medical advice, and prayer is not a substitute for professional medical care. If you want to build a daily prayer habit, Pray Focus offers a free library of prayers by topic, including comfort, healing, and anxiety, plus a free prayer generator, so you can pray alongside the care you receive.

Learn to pray.Make it a daily habit.

One email at a time, at your pace

Join our free email course and learn simple, time-tested ways to pray, with one small thing to try each time, so prayer slowly becomes part of your day.

  • 8 short lessons: the Daily Examen, Lectio Divina, ACTS and more
  • One tiny exercise each time, so praying becomes a habit
  • Gentle and practical, never preachy. Free, forever.

Frequently asked questions

Sources

  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health (Roberts et al.)
  2. American Heart Journal, STEP trial of intercessory prayer (Benson et al., 2006)
  3. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Religiosity/spirituality and mortality meta-analysis (Chida et al., 2009)
  4. Pew Research Center, Prayer and Other Religious Practices (2023-24 Religious Landscape Study)
  5. Journal of Religion and Health, Prevalence of healing prayer (Levin, 2010 Baylor Religion Survey)
  6. Psychotherapy Research, Religious and spirituality-based therapy meta-analysis (Bouwhuis-van Keulen et al., 2023)

Related articles

Download today for free

It takes 2 minutes to get started. Download this Christian prayer app, set up the app blocker, and begin building a praying habit.